[no subject]

Thanks!!!


On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Yu, Jerry wrote:

> just to clarify, you didn't use 'smtp' literally,right?   'exim' , or
> the actual "daemon process name (argv[0])", should be used, per
> hosts_access man page.
> just for test (while you trust your firewall), use 'ALL:ALL' to test.
> 
> all this said, w/o experience with 'exim'
> 
> # -----Original Message-----


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00013" href="msg00013.html">[ale] I lied, tcp wrappers question (was bastille/exim)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Jerry.Yu at Voicecom.com (Yu, Jerry)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00014.html">[ale] exim or bastille problem...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00016.html">[ale] AverTV Usb ----/dev/video</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00013.html">[ale] I lied, tcp wrappers question (was bastille/exim)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00016.html">[ale] AverTV Usb ----/dev/video</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00015"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00015"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>