[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] gcc-3.4.2 backwards-incompatibility?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Mills, John M. wrote:
|
| I don't see the "backwards" compatibility warning in the build trace. How
| should this migration be handled? Do I just need to add '-I...' paths, and
| if so, what should I use?
|

The C++ programming interfaces have changed dramatically to become more
"standards compliant" in the 3.x.x releases.  Some programs that haven't
yet been updated may require a 2.x.x release to properly build.  This
should be considered a bug and the author should be notified.

It probably won't build on gcc 4.0.0 either.

	- Mike

- --
Michael B. Trausch                               <fd0man at gmail.com>
Website: http://fd0man.chadeux.net/     Jabber: mtrausch at jabber.com
Phone: +1-(678)-522-7934              FAX (US Only): 1-866-806-4647
===================================================================
Do you have PGP or GPG?  Key at pgp.mit.edu, Please Encrypt E-Mail!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCcQYVPXInbkqM7nwRA4UjAJ9fMmGCEDeDyuv4sXwGSc7mjnvQZACfSL+d
JajZBlcV4oVqARaC8RyZSzw=
=BwWs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----