[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations
- Subject: [ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations
- From: Aaron.Klepinger at CompuCredit.com (Klepinger, Aaron)
- Date: Mon Apr 11 16:14:48 2005
This is not what people are reporting on dslreports.com. VoicePulse
even has some sort of QOS feature as part of their service "Bandwidth
Limiter" or something they call it.
-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of
Michael B. Trausch
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 1:52 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] [OT] VoIP recommendations
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jim Popovitch wrote:
> I heavily looked into doing the all VoIP at Home thing a few months ago.
> In short the latency and packetloss issues of using either 256K DSL
> (BellSouth) or 5Mb/384k Cable (Comcast) made it impossible to conduct
> a business call without seriously causing problems for people on the
> other end of the call or conference bridge. Vonage is probably ok for
> limited use to call and order a pizza or such. VoIP in general for
> broadband home users just isn't there (IMHO) for "realtime"
> conversations where you don't have a 5 sec lag and you aren't
constantly repeating things.
>
> A really really bad TDMA cellphone connection is still better than
> broadband VoIP these days. Tomorrow may change things as codecs are
> constantly improved and networks (hopefully) become more reliable.
>