[no subject]

sight
	Stephan


On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 13:30, Stephan Uphoff wrote:
> A friend of mine is using it for 30k+ accounts and recommended it.
> I installed it a few month ago for just two accounts and it was
> easy and painless. The documentation is good and for simple installs
> you should be done in an hour. (This includes skimming the necessary
> documents).
> 
> 	Stephan
> 
> On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 22:28, Nathan J. Underwood wrote:
> > I'm in the process of replacing an NT4 / Exchange network with a *nix 
> > (Linux, Samba, <mail server>) backend, and I'm to the mail stuff now. 
> > It's going to be a Fedora setup, and I would really prefer to stick with 
> > RPM packages rather than source so that updates can be handled (as much 
> > as possible) via apt or yum.  I've used sendmail and qmail in the past, 
> > and would prefer to use qmail (don't get me started on sendmail), but 
> > I've not been able to find a qmail rpm.  Postfix looks like the next 
> > best thing, so I've been tinkering with it (2 config files so far, I 
> > love that) as an MTA.  Since they'll be moving from an Exchange world, 
> > and they're used to never having to delete anything (again, don't get me 
> > started) and being able to get access to the same 'picture' of their 
> > mail from multiple locations (office, home, webmail), I believe IMAP 
> > would be a better option than POP3.  They will have 3 servers when it's 
> > all said and done, one will be the primary file server and acting PDC 
> > (Samba 3 + LDAP), the other two will function as primary / secondary DNS 
> > and DHCP servers, and the secondary will also function as a BDC 
> > (slurpd).  In looking at available IMAP servers, it looks like 
> > Washington and Cyrus are the two main players.  The big advantage of 
> > Cyrus over Washington appears to be that there isn't a need for a local 
> > account, which isn't really a big deal since all mail users will have 
> > local accounts.  Any thoughts?  Should I consider Washington, or drive 
> > on with Cyrus?  Any other input / suggestions would also be appreciated. 
> >  I'm looking at using a SpamAssassin / ClamAV combo for av and anti-spam.
> > 
> > tia
> > nathan
> > --
> > 
> > registered linux user # 73046
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
&gt; &gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; Ale mailing list
&gt; Ale at ale.org
&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt; 
&gt; 


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00761" href="msg00761.html">[ale] Cyrus -vs- Washington IMAP (and any others)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ale1 at cybertechcafe.net (Nathan J. Underwood)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00792" href="msg00792.html">[ale] Cyrus -vs- Washington IMAP (and any others)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ups at tree.com (Stephan Uphoff)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00792.html">[ale] Cyrus -vs- Washington IMAP (and any others)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00794.html">[ale] Cyrus -vs- Washington IMAP (and any others)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00792.html">[ale] Cyrus -vs- Washington IMAP (and any others)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00764.html">[ale] Linux Mail Server Recomendations</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00793"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00793"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>