[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue Sep 21 20:12:33 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: qzpanfu ng punegre.arg (Rbht [p@nfu) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] patch-o-matic-ng question? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Sep 21 20:12:33 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: dmcnash at charter.net (Doug McNash)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00688.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00688.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] patch-o-matic-ng question?</li>
Each of the patches may apply to either/and/or any of the kernels. Some
are applied to the iptables source. Many are unnecessary for recent
code as they have already been updated. When I ran the script it gives
you the info on the patch and the option to apply it. The first time
thru I chose to apply most of them all and it screwed up the source
pretty badly. Second time around I only applied the three or four I
wanted, mainly string matching and the TARPIT target. I suggest you do
the same and be very selective.
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:26, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking to install the record-rpc patch from the patch-o-matic
> distribution in order to permit easier firewalling of NFS traffic. On the
> netfilter-org site, there's the latest patch-o-matic tarball, with a
> release date of Dec 2003, and patch-o-matic-ng, which appears to be in
> current development.
>
> Unfortunately, there's very little documentation either on the
> netfilter.org site or anywhere else that google can find that explains the
> difference between the two (other than "ng is newer"). Can someone fill me
> in here? Specifically, I need to verify that at least one of these supports
> the 2.6.x kernels (I'm on 2.6.7).
>
> Also, I attempted to run the runme script from the ng tarball, and I
> noticed that it asks for the root of the kernel source base
> (/usr/src/linux), but also asks for the iptables codebase (default
> location: /usr/src/iptables). Is there a source tree inside the kernel for
> this I can point it to, or do I need to have the source code for the
> iptables app available?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Chris
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00688" href="msg00688.html">[ale] patch-o-matic-ng question?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> rekoil at semihuman.com (Chris Woodfield)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00714.html">[ale] Firefox & IE ... yada yada yada</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00716.html">[ale] Firefox beats million-download deadline in just 6 days</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00688.html">[ale] patch-o-matic-ng question?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00691.html">[ale] Firefox & IE ... yada yada yada</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00715"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00715"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>