[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon Sep 20 17:57:52 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wbfu ng pngrn.bet (Xbfu Terrzna) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 1095717124.14947.16.camel@reddwarf -->
- <!--x-reference: 1095698059.6753.20.camel@6-allhosts -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon Sep 20 17:57:52 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: josh at catea.org (Josh Freeman)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00638.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <1095698059.6753.20.camel@6-allhosts> <<a href="msg00632.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00633.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00638.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</li>
Josh
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 17:43, Geoffrey wrote:
> George Carless wrote:
> > I didn't look at the original email, so apologies if this isn't relevant
> > (but in most cases it tends to be): tables should not be used to
> > control layout! CSS is more than up to the job, and is the right tool
> > for the job. Table-based layouts are a pain in the neck and are a nasty
> > hack. And any time I hear talk of nested tables etc., I can only sigh..
>
> Any time I hear someone talk about CSS, I can only sigh. If you're
> going to do any amount of CSS, you'll end up with at least two different
> sets, one for IE and one for everyone else. CSS is hardly the perfect
> solution. I can throw a table together with my eyes shut, and in most
> cases, it works with all browsers. CSS on the other hand, as I've noted
> is going to have you coding to sets of CSS for the browsers.
>
> I'm not saying tables is a better solution, I'm just saying be prepared
> for double work with CSS.
--
Josh Freeman
Technical Manager
Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00623" href="msg00623.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00632" href="msg00632.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kevinostoll at yahoo.com (Kevin O'Neill Stoll)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00633" href="msg00633.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00638" href="msg00638.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00640.html">[ale] Who's on first</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00642.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00638.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00642.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00641"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00641"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>