[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon Sep 20 17:48:21 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: rfbgrevp ng 3gvzrf25.arg (Urbsserl) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1095698059.6753.20.camel@6-allhosts -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon Sep 20 17:48:21 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00633.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <1095698059.6753.20.camel@6-allhosts> <<a href="msg00632.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00633.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</li>
Any time I hear someone talk about CSS, I can only sigh. If you're
going to do any amount of CSS, you'll end up with at least two different
sets, one for IE and one for everyone else. CSS is hardly the perfect
solution. I can throw a table together with my eyes shut, and in most
cases, it works with all browsers. CSS on the other hand, as I've noted
is going to have you coding to sets of CSS for the browsers.
I'm not saying tables is a better solution, I'm just saying be prepared
for double work with CSS.
--
Until later, Geoffrey Registered Linux User #108567
AT&T Certified UNIX System Programmer - 1995
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00641" href="msg00641.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> josh at catea.org (Josh Freeman)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00642" href="msg00642.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ale at accipiter.org (Christopher R. Curzio)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00648" href="msg00648.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00649" href="msg00649.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> fletch at phydeaux.org (Fletch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00655" href="msg00655.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00623" href="msg00623.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00632" href="msg00632.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kevinostoll at yahoo.com (Kevin O'Neill Stoll)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00633" href="msg00633.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00637.html">[ale] OT: Sales Position</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00639.html">[ale] Vonage invite?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00635.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00641.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00638"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00638"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>