[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon Sep 20 15:32:57 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: nggevry ng q20obneqf.arg (nggevry) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1095698059.6753.20.camel@6-allhosts -->
- <!--x-reference: 20040920184703.26192.qmail@web51 409.mail.yahoo.com -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon Sep 20 15:32:57 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: attriel at d20boards.net (attriel)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00633.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <1095698059.6753.20.camel@6-allhosts><20040920184703.26192.qmail@web51 409.mail.yahoo.com> <<a href="msg00633.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</li>
I used to feel the same way, but then I tried to define a layout with 3
columns at the top, followed by a few full-width areas.
There is no way to do this in CSS (AFAICT) that allow all areas to be
dynamically sized based on the quantity of the content. The closest I
could come had the 3 top parts stairstepping down the page, so it was like
they were vertically stacked, but without being vertically stacked.
I fell back to tables until such time as I can figure out how to do that
layout without absolute positioning (which appears to be how most CSS
layouts are done :( )
--attriel
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00635" href="msg00635.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00623" href="msg00623.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00633" href="msg00633.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00633.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00635.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00633.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00635.html">[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00634"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00634"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>