[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue Sep 14 22:13:17 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wxvaarl ng ybpnyargfbyhgvbaf.pbz (Xnzrf B. Yvaarl WWW) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Redundant File Servers -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Sep 14 22:13:17 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00468.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00446.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00468.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Redundant File Servers</li>
The "shoot in the head" method is good until there is a problem with the
B machine. HA only work as long as there is failover capability.
Headshot HA requires a fast reboot process with a good amount of logic
in the HA startup.
Note also, HA really only works best as a read-only service. Unless all
nodes are active and there is a separate synch process from the writes.
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 13:42, Stephan Uphoff wrote:
> Read up on split-brain syndrome.
> This happens when both servers think that the other one is dead
> and access a shared storage device.
> This can destroy a filesystem really, really fast.
> Depending on your heartbeat solution this can happen as easily as
> a server being to busy/low on memory,.. to send a heartbeat signal.
> With a bad heartbeat solution your redundant server setup can
> be less reliable then a single server.
> A good solution is the "shoot them in the head" approach:
> If server B thinks server A is dead -> B cuts the power to A.
> Now B can be sure that A is dead ;-)
>
>
> On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 08:50, Kevin O'Neill Stoll wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have been doing some research about either:
> > a failover pair of fileservers, possibly load-balanced
> > across the pair
> > or
> > a high-availability load-balanced cluster of file servers
> >
> > I just wanted to know if anyone was already working with a
> > particular setup or product that they have had success
> > with. I have been doing all the basic reading / research
> > that I can find via google, tldp, and linux-ha.org.
> >
> > I have already found OpenGFS, a Networked Raid 1 type
> > setup, and supposedly RedHat's cluster management package
> > has a solution available.
> >
> > Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > =====
> > Kevin Stoll
> > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://kevinstoll.com/">http://kevinstoll.com/</a>
> >
> > OpenSource Software...FREE!
> > Angering Bill Gates...priceless.
> > ============================================================
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://vote.yahoo.com">http://vote.yahoo.com</a>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
> !DSPAM:41472db2172307804616587!
--
James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \ one Linux user /
Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time. /
770-493-8244 \.___________________________./
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.localnetsolutions.com">http://www.localnetsolutions.com</a>
GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00484" href="msg00484.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kevinostoll at yahoo.com (Kevin O'Neill Stoll)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00446" href="msg00446.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kevinostoll at yahoo.com (Kevin O'Neill Stoll)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00468" href="msg00468.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ups at tree.com (Stephan Uphoff)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00482.html">[ale] cheap professional hi-speed internet access - for a business</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00484.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00468.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00484.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00483"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00483"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>