[no subject]

> If you really want active-active, be prepared to spend a lot ;-). Also, be 
> extremely sure you know exactly what you're buying. HA terminology tends to 
> vary in meaning from vendor to vendor. For example, Steeleye has what they 
> call an active-active cluster, but what they mean by that is something 
> conceptually like:
> 
> * node1 is running Samba
> * node2 is running Apache
> * if either node dies, both apps run on the other node
> 

Good point.  

Has anyone here done iSCSI?  It may be possible to do raid over iSCSI.



</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00455" href="msg00455.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kaboom at gatech.edu (Chris Ricker)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00449" href="msg00449.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kevinostoll at yahoo.com (Kevin O'Neill Stoll)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00451" href="msg00451.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kaboom at gatech.edu (Chris Ricker)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00452.html">[ale] UserLinux</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00454.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00451.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00455.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00453"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00453"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>