[no subject]

> Hi all,
> 
> I have been doing some research about either:
> a failover pair of fileservers, possibly load-balanced
> across the pair 
> or 
> a high-availability load-balanced cluster of file servers

More specifics:

* do you want active-active (both nodes serving) or active-passive (one node 
takes over when the other dies)
* fileserving how? NFS? AFS? Samba? ftp? web?

later,
chris


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00449" href="msg00449.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kevinostoll at yahoo.com (Kevin O'Neill Stoll)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00446" href="msg00446.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kevinostoll at yahoo.com (Kevin O'Neill Stoll)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00446.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00448.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00446.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00449.html">[ale] Redundant File Servers</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00447"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00447"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>