[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
Any environment I create has to be replicated and standard for my other
programmers. I'm not the only one developing.
On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 16:42, Mike Panetta wrote:
> Why are you doing a native compile? Why do you not
> cross compile it? Thats the standard way to set up
> a system like this...
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Fowler <cfowler at outpostsentinel.com>
> Sent: Sep 12, 2004 9:49 AM
> To: Stephan Uphoff <ups at tree.com>
> Cc: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
> Subject: Re: [ale] Fast NFS
>
> I think it may be related to the ARM board. It has only 32mb of mem and
> that is not much when compiling glibc.
>
> Here is kernel log:
>
> __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x92/0)
> __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x92/0)
> __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x92/0)
> __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x92/0)
> __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x92/0)
>
> Which tells me we are running out of memeory.
>
> On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 23:54, Stephan Uphoff wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 23:12, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> > > Funmy.
> > >
> > > I can't imagine a busty load. I'm on a 100mbs switch and all I'm doing
> > > on the ARM is compiling GCC. What else could be going on that the NFS
> > > server does not respond? It is only serving up one share to one
> > > machine. It is doing nothing else.
> >
> > Are you using NFS2 or NFS3 ?
> >
> > Have you tried to reduce the write/read size all the way down to 1024 ?
> >
> > Some network cards are just overwhelmed when a packet train for
> > a big NFS request/reply is coming in.
> >
> > What NIC are you using on the server?
> >
> > How big is the receive queue on your arm board?
> > Can the board get enough memory to replace the buffers used
> > by the received frames?
> >
> > As always a network sniffer is your best friend.
> >
> >
> > Stephan
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 21:29, Pete Hardie wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:32:58 -0400, Stephan Uphoff <ups at tree.com> wrote:
> > > > > My guess is that IP fragmentation issues (packet loss under load, busty
> > > > > load .. ) are killing you. (You are using UDP right ?)
> > > >
> > > > "Busty load"??? When did they extend NFS to recognize porn? :->
> >
> > NFS 6 ?
> >
> > Not that I know of - but NFS 4 gained non persistent file handles for
> > the MS crowd :-( .... so they are definitely trying for mass appeal :-)
> >
> >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Ale mailing list
> > > > Ale at ale.org
> > > > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ale mailing list
> > > Ale at ale.org
> > > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> > >
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00381" href="msg00381.html">[ale] Fast NFS</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ahuitzot at mindspring.com (Mike Panetta)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00385.html">[ale] Fast NFS</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00387.html">[ale] New To The List</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00381.html">[ale] Fast NFS</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00382.html">[ale] Fast NFS</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00386"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00386"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>