[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue Sep 7 14:49:00 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: ehazna ng fcrrqsnpgbel.arg (ehazna ng fcrrqsnpgbel.arg) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] What's so special about gmail invites? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Sep 7 14:49:00 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: runman at speedfactory.net (runman at speedfactory.net)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00201.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] What's so special about gmail invites?</li>
>On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:07:09PM +0000, runman at speedfactory.net wrote:
>[...]
>> However, when I send an
>> email to someone's gmail address - a "private" email - I shouldn't
>> have to worry about it being in the public domain
>
>Why not? This is the point I've been trying to make since this thread
>started: email is not private or secure. Period.
Then you need to either 1)take a law class to become more familiar with
your rights or you can just 2) notice how Google changed their policies
after a CA court came down with a ruling that yes, Virginia your email
to Santa is indeed considered private. Private correspondence has
always been and still is private - regardless of the form it takes.
Recall how one needs a subpoena or warrant to get mail from an ISP ????
Wonder why messing with the USPS is a "Federal offense" and not some
local misdemeanor ?? A reasonable person (s) has a reasonable
expectation of privacy in email. That is the standard. Period. There
is a considerable amount of case law about privacy and what it takes to
violate it on the part of the government and others.
Yes, I know it goes thru many servers, but so does your letter go thru
many hands. I seriously doubt too many ISP?s want to embark on a
?dedicated and massive data mining effort? to read everyone?s email like
Google is in the process of doing with gmail. And yes, I am well aware
that email is insecure and not as private as whispering in someone?s ear
. but that is the state of technology ? and not a deliberate act on the
part of Google. What I am saying is if you want to give up your rights
then fine ? do so. *But* I chose not to do so and thus Google needs to
keep their data mining mitts off of my correspondence. I know that the
technology is insecure, but there is a difference between the reality of
the situation and a deliberate act.
If it's a truly
>private email and you don't want anyone but the recipient looking at it,
>your only choice is to use encryption. But even then, there's no
>guarantee.
>
>> and if I don't want
>> Google to use it, then how do I get it out of their system ???
>
>I suppose the same way you might try to get usenet posts out of their
>system. Or emails out of the ALE archive.
>
>I can already hear the arguments: "But those are public messages, I'm
>talking about private messages". There are no "private" email messages.
>Even if there were a strong legal precedent, the infrastructure simply
>cannot guarantee it. There is also user error: when the reply-to
>behavior was changed for the ALE list so that replies went to the list
>by default, instead of to the recipient as it was previously, a lot of
>people sent obviously "private" messages to the list, instead of the
>sender. Those "private" messages are still in the ALE archive, and who
>knows how many search engines/caches/etc. There's no way to get those
>messages out of all of the systems involved.
>
>> >> I mean, corporations wouldn't do anything *illegal* now, even for
>> >> profit, would they?
>>
>> .. and what planet are you living on ??? Can I get tickets to go there
>> ??? Until the law gets rid of seeing faceless corporations as a legal
>> entity in criminal matters and starts to hold real live persons
>> accountable for their actions ...
>
>I think he was being facetious, but he raises a good point. How do you
>know that [insert big faceless corporate ISP] doesn't scan all emails
>for keywords and build profiles?
>
>Jason
>--
>Jason Day jasonday at
><a rel="nofollow" href="http://jasonday.home.att.net">http://jasonday.home.att.net</a> worldnet dot att dot net
>
>"Of course I'm paranoid, everyone is trying to kill me."
> -- Weyoun-6, Star Trek: Deep Space 9
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00201" href="msg00201.html">[ale] What's so special about gmail invites?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jasonday at worldnet.att.net (Jason Day)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00205.html">[ale] What's so special about gmail invites?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00207.html">[ale] What's so special about gmail invites?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00275.html">[ale] What's so special about gmail invites?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00118.html">[ale] What's so special about gmail invites?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00206"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00206"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>