[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] $&*@ing gmail

Subject: [ale] $&*@ing gmail
From: fletch at phydeaux.org (Fletch)
Date: Thu Sep 9 11:11:36 2004
In-reply-to: <[email protected]> ([email protected]'s message of "Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:50:19 -0400 (EDT)")
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

>>>>> "attriel" == attriel  <attriel at d20boards.net> writes:

[...]
    >> How about we just REPLY TO THE PERSON OFFERING THE INVITE
    >> INSTEAD OF THE WHOLE FRIGGIN LIST?!!!

    attriel> Oh no.  Are we going to end up with the whole "reply-to"
    attriel> discussion now?

Of course not.  Why when given an excelent example of why it's a brain
dead setup would anyone want to disagree with it . . .

*cough*

Sorry, was that out loud?  :)

-- 
Fletch                | "If you find my answers frightening,       __`'/|
fletch at phydeaux.org   |  Vincent, you should cease askin'          \ o.O'
                      |  scary questions." -- Jules                =(___)=
                      |                                               U

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] $&*@ing gmail
  - From: james at sumners.ath.cx (james at sumners.ath.cx)

References:
- [ale] $&*@ing gmail
  - From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
- [ale] $&*@ing gmail
  - From: jdr at xcorps.net (Jonathan Rickman)
- [ale] $&*@ing gmail
  - From: attriel at d20boards.net (attriel)

Prev by Date: [ale] Meeting Tonight?
Next by Date: [ale] $&*@ing gmail
Previous by thread: [ale] $&*@ing gmail
Next by thread: [ale] $&*@ing gmail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread