[no subject]

I'm tempted to remove my PPTP VPN for my wireless connection and go with
straight WPA for protection (due to my current icmp woes).  However, I've
read that while WPA is an improvement, it's still very much hackable.

I guess what I'm curious about is just *how* hackable it is?  A google
search simply leads me to articles stating the fact, but with no hardcore
details regarding hacking it.

Anyone actually seen it hacked?  Is it extremely less secure than PPTP vpn
over wireless?

Thanks,
John


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00858" href="msg00858.html">[ale] Considering WPA and wireless security</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00856.html">[ale] Stumped by Slashdot and network problems</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00858.html">[ale] Considering WPA and wireless security</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00863.html">[ale] Lightweight Spreadsheet for Slack/Windowmaker</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00858.html">[ale] Considering WPA and wireless security</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00857"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00857"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>