[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Wed Oct 20 06:31:24 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: rfbgrevp ng 3gvzrf25.arg (Urbsserl) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: BD0A1F0DF7411F4981F2D4AB268649E6782CF1@mail-10ps -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Teaching Opportunity -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Wed Oct 20 06:31:24 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00742.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <BD0A1F0DF7411F4981F2D4AB268649E6782CF1@mail-10ps> <<a href="msg00731.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00742.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Teaching Opportunity</li>
>> I still stand by my assessment of the class though. :)
>
> Before I got burned out on travel and went back to being a full-time
> sysadmin, I worked for several years for a Unix consulting / training
> company doing training and consulting world-wide. Course outlines
> like this one are not at all unusual. As long as everyone involved
> (especially the client!) knows up front that two days is not enough
> time to cover any meaningful subject thoroughly and the instructor is
> knowledgeable enough to flex to fit the real needs of the client, I'm
> sure it'll work out satisfactorily for the client.
I've done a bit of training, not much. On the other hand, I've spent
alot of time in training classes. I for one, have never seen a training
class with an outline such as this. If in fact, this is the direction
these training organizations are taking, I think it is a mistake.
I can't understand the use of a class that claims to cover all that was
outlined in this thread in 2 days. At best, it could be a summary of
what is possible with these technologies put together. So who would
find this useful? But that's not even what was suggested.
--
Until later, Geoffrey Registered Linux User #108567
AT&T Certified UNIX System Programmer - 1995
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00724" href="msg00724.html">[ale] Teaching Opportunity</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> lisa at accelebrate.com (Lisa Bell)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00731" href="msg00731.html">[ale] Teaching Opportunity</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00742" href="msg00742.html">[ale] Teaching Opportunity</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kaboom at gatech.edu (Chris Ricker)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00744.html">[ale] Rolling your own terminal emulator</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00746.html">[ale] Xnest</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00742.html">[ale] Teaching Opportunity</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00627.html">[ale] OT: KVM Switches?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00745"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00745"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>