[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Oct 7 17:03:31 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: oneel ng nyygp.pbz (Pneel Vnjxvaf) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 7674082A-18A3-11D9-9480-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: A88B2F7C91000D41A5C09550ABF5C39B398332@poly_propylene.corp.polyengineering.com -->
- <!--x-reference: 37E6AC68-1875-11D9-9480-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected]-a-geek.com --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?) -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Oct 7 17:03:31 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: barry at alltc.com (Barry Hawkins)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00309.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <A88B2F7C91000D41A5C09550ABF5C39B398332@poly_propylene.corp.polyengineering.com> <<a href="msg00288.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00309.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?)</li>
- Hash: SHA1
On Oct 7, 2004, at 3:53 PM, Bjorn Dittmer-Roche wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Barry Hawkins wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2004, at 9:40 AM, Preston Boyington wrote:
>>
>>> Greg wrote:
>>>> * Needs to be easily updatable. CVSup is ok. I am fine with
>>>> a command line.
>>> err, apt-get? aptitude?
>>
>> I have found apt-get and aptitude quite good, and better at
>> identifying dependency issues than CVSup, but that's just my personal
>> opinion from experience.
>
> I agree, but I think this has mostly to do with Debian's camparatively
> large and active user base rather than the apt system vs ports. One
> Debian developer I know keeps insisting that debian is superior
> because of it's strict policy about software and updates. He may be
> right and he knows better than I do, but my impression is that it has
> more to do with the user base. (before RH had apt, he used to insist
> that apt made debian superior. now it's the policy. whatever.)
This is quite possibly true, although the FreeBSD ports collection has
a pretty massive user base as well.
> Whatever the reason, the upshot is that you can pretty much always
> count on the Debian stuff to work -- expecially in stable, but also in
> testing -- whereas I have definately found things not working on
> FreeBSD after an update, and that can be a big pain.
Same here.
>>>> FreeBSD has java,jboss, netbeans, and smarty in it's package
>>>> system. No one else has any of them (linux only has java). They
>>>> have
>>>> embraced java as well as kept things relatively light. Is used by
>>>> many large
>>>> installations. I am well versed in OpenBSD so it's familiar and
>>>> easily updateable (but it puts a strain on the system during make
>>>> (buildworld/installworld/buildkernel/installkernel) as
>>>> opposed to Debians binary download). FreeBSD will also allow me to
>>>> use packages
>>>> or ports (more configurable). Just hope it recognizes the
>>>> shift-fn-keypad
>>>> combo (IT DOES !!! DANG !! SWEET!!) so I can manipulate screen
>>>> resolutions
>>>> on the box.
>> A couple of caveats on FreeBSD's java support. First, there is no
>> native jdk/jre. You have to use Linux JDKs with Linux binary
>> compatibility enabled. Second, you can compile your own native JDK
>> using the java/jdk14 port in FreeBSD, but be aware that it is a
>> journey involving the initial install of the Sun Linux JDK to
>> bootstrap the build, the download of several of the Sun SCSL-licensed
>> source package (you have to download these manually, due to licensing
>> technicalities; the package cannot do it automatically), the download
>> of the necessary patchset from the guy at eyesbeyond.com who
>> maintains it on his own, and then the install. At the end of all
>> that effort, you find that the licensing implies stuff so shaky that
>> you expect to get an email from Scott McNealy with an MP3 of the
>> C.O.P.S. soundtrack attached to it - appropriately licensed, of
>> course.
>>
>> If Java support is a big issue for you, I would urge you to consider
>> a full-fledged Debian install.
>
> I did not find the java install to be so difficult. Going into the
> appropriate folder in the ports collection and typing "make install"
> walks you through what you need to do. The only thing I recall
> downloading manually was the SCSL-licensed source package.
I would not say that building a native 1.4 JDK is difficult at all.
The maintainers of that port do a great job, and they are bound to the
SCSL restrictions like anyone else. I would say that it's less
streamlined than, say, installing the Linux Sun JDK using Linux binary
compatibility on FreeBSD.
> I think it took me longer to figure out what to put in my apt source
> list on debian (debian does not include java for political reasons)
> than to get Java working on FreeBSD.
I can't speak to that yet. On my Debian PowerPC installs I have simply
downloaded the IBM PPC 32 1.4 JDK and unzipped it, set JAVA_HOME and
added java/bin to PATH. That was pretty straightforward.
> I think both Debian and FreeBSD are great choices for the laptop. Feel
> free to ask on this list if you need help installing Java on either
> system.
Thanks, I may do that.
> bjorn
>
> -------------------
> Bjorn Dittmer-Roche
> XO Audio LLC
>
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.xowave.com">http://www.xowave.com</a>
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.xoaudio.com">http://www.xoaudio.com</a>
Regards
Barry C. Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBZa2p7bZ6kUftWZwRAkf5AJ45PK3S6/Q8IEeDTBfHP9y7aiyOggCgvRdi
KSBypw04KFWZwRhYnAGxNik=
=OLn4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00282" href="msg00282.html">[ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> PBoyington at polyengineering.com (Preston Boyington)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00288" href="msg00288.html">[ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> barry at alltc.com (Barry Hawkins)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00309" href="msg00309.html">[ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> bjorn at sccs.swarthmore.edu (Bjorn Dittmer-Roche)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00311.html">[ale] RE: sshd crashing, RH AS 3</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00313.html">[ale] C with ed</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00309.html">[ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00295.html">[ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00312"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00312"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>