[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-date: Thu Oct 7 09:48:26 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: BPblvatgba ng cbylratvarrevat.pbz (Berfgba Pblvatgba) -->
- <!--x-message-id: A88B2F7C91000D41A5C09550ABF5C39B398332@poly_propylene.corp.polyengineering.com -->
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?) -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Oct 7 09:48:26 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: PBoyington at polyengineering.com (Preston Boyington)</li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?)</li>
I use Debian on a Compaq 133MHz/32ram laptop, your system should not be a problem.
> * Req'd programs are vi, quanta, bluefish, aterm, xterm, a
> file manager, ssh, scp, LinNeighborhood (and samba client), jboss (or cuacho resin),
> apache, tomcat, netbeans, j2ee, postgresql, php, smarty, ADOdb, pear,
> abiword, gnumeric, mozilla firefox, mozilla thunderbird, and
> a lite wm - either IceWm or xfce (evaluating both right this minute).
> This will handle my php and java dev stuff as well as light office requirments.
>
all available under various apt sources or by building from source. I use Fluxbox personally, but IceWM is comfortable for most people.
> * Needs to be easily updatable. CVSup is ok. I am fine with
> a command line.
>
err, apt-get? aptitude?
> Summary of what we have tried or thought about;
>
> Debian is too constrictive (just blew away the libranet
> distro for too many conflicts in a postgresql install). Don't have time for that
> crap. But was ok for an hour or so.
Ah, you used Libranet. Libranet is nice for a good "all around" install, but IMHO it doesn't do some things as well as a "real" Debian install. Especially when you are trying to tailor an installation to fit specific needs.
> Probably should have not upgraded from
> stable and gone to current/release/whatever it's called. Too many os's today.
>
Would depend on your situation I guess. I run 3.0 on my laptop ("Woody" which is the current stable) with no problems. I don't think I will upgrade to 3.1 ("Sarge") because it does everything I need. Anything else I can build from source.
> OpenBSD seemed to look like crap on the screen.
Have used OpenBSD for a couple of servers, but for a BSD laptop I would think NetBSD or FreeBSD.
> Suse 9.1 was too heavy also
Agreed. Like SuSE on a strong desktop, but older laptops it is a bit of a hog.
>
> Slackware - I have no experience using it and it's probably
> not cutting edge enough.
Haven't used Slack in a while, but never had a big problem. Even had it running well on the same laptop.
If you are a BSD fan then I would think Slackware and Debian would be a little more intuitive than SuSE or Red Hat IMHO. It's as cutting edge as your source.
> RH/Fedora/whatever - I left them when they abandoned the home
> user market.
same here. Will probably break down and install it again to get familiar with the layout, but don't see me running it as my primary ever again.
> FreeBSD has java,jboss, netbeans, and smarty in it's package
> system. No one else has any of them (linux only has java). They have
> embraced java as well as kept things relatively light. Is used by many large
> installations. I am well versed in OpenBSD so it's familiar and
> easily updateable (but it puts a strain on the system during make
> (buildworld/installworld/buildkernel/installkernel) as
> opposed to Debians binary download). FreeBSD will also allow me to use packages
> or ports (more configurable). Just hope it recognizes the shift-fn-keypad
> combo (IT DOES !!! DANG !! SWEET!!) so I can manipulate screen resolutions
> on the box.
>
I haven't used FreeBSD in a couple of years, but it wouldn't "bother me" to use it again. Although I would probably go NetBSD for a desktop system unless the FreeB's have caught up to them with hardware support.
> So the only thing I have left right now is it recognizing the
> cardbus nic.
>
> Greg
>
Sounds like a nice project. I wish you hadn't had the "bad" Debian experience, but at least you have something you are comfortable with using. I think that is the most important point.
Preston
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00288" href="msg00288.html">[ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> barry at alltc.com (Barry Hawkins)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00295" href="msg00295.html">[ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kwc at TheWorld.com (Kenneth W Cochran)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00281.html">[ale] could somebody moderate this?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00283.html">[ale] Fedora Core 2 Updates</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00369.html">[ale] C with ed</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00288.html">[ale] Greg's using "those guys" ; -) (was: could somebody moderate this?)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00282"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00282"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>