[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Fri Nov 12 09:23:09 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wfurrgf ng lnubb.pbz (Xrenyq Eurrgf) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: Pine.LNX.4.44.0411120730250.16672-[email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Distro question... -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Fri Nov 12 09:23:09 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jsheets at yahoo.com (Jerald Sheets)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00498.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00498.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Distro question...</li>
Novell bought them, and IBM also fully supports them on their power
architecture. It's one of only two istros that will run in an LPAR on
an RS/6000 p-series.
Too much support from heavy hitters in the IT game.
--Jerald
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 07:33 -0600, Aditya Srinivasan wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Geoffrey wrote:
>
> > Aditya Srinivasan wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Jay Finch wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> That's a very good point, Jonathan! My only concern is that Redhat
> > >> doesn't offer support for RH9 any longer, and there's a
> > >> possibility that the support through Fedoralegacy.org will
> > >> eventually be discontinued. I don't want to be the situation I was
> > >> (until last November) where I have an outdated Distro (RH 6.2) with
> > >> no easy update path. (I purged and went to RH9 because the server
> > >> got compromised.)
> > >
> > >
> > > Wondering .... If that is the main concern, then perhaps Suse and
> > > Slackware could also possibly present problems in the future ??
> > > Debian may be the best bet.
> >
> > I've upgraded SuSE from 6.0 to 9.2, I don't think that's going to be a
> > problem. I don't think you'll have a problem with Slack updates either.
>
> Hmm. My concern was more along the lines of the possibility of free
> upgrade support for Suse/Slackware being eventually discontinued at some
> point in the future. I perceive the likelihood of that happening with
> Debian, as being somewhat lower.
>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00510" href="msg00510.html">[ale] Distro question...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jwl at sgi.com (Jim Lynch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00498" href="msg00498.html">[ale] Distro question...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> sriad at uab.edu (Aditya Srinivasan)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00503.html">[ale] Distro question...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00505.html">[ale] Distro question...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00500.html">[ale] Distro question...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00510.html">[ale] Distro question...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00504"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00504"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>