[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Its over. Maybe
- Subject: [ale] Its over. Maybe
- From: dcorbin at enttek.com (David Corbin)
- Date: Fri Nov 5 15:51:38 2004
- In-reply-to: <1099684222.2076.23.camel@blue>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1099684222.2076.23.camel@blue>
On Friday 05 November 2004 02:50 pm, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 13:36 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
> > The independent review identified problems with the system. Let me be
> > clear. An independent review where identified issues are addressed.
>
> The SAIC report DID identify and address the issues. I've ccp'ed the
> text below so that you don't have to go find it again. I encourage you
> and everyone else to read this short executive overview so that you
> fully understand what SAIC had to say.
>
> To me, it seems quite clear that SAIC did a complete examination and
> provided a lengthy list of implementation recommendations that DO
> address the identified issues. I ask once again, What more could you
> want?
I *think* what he wants, is for the "system" to be corrected as a result of
the independent review, not just to have the review done.