[ale] Its over. Maybe

[kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)]

> or the people polled could have lied to the poll takers like I did. 
> the exit poll "results" would be a great way to edge your candidate.
 
> reporter: "this candidate" is performing a sweeping victory in all
> boxes polled.
 
> this leads people that were going to vote for "another candidate" to
> be dissuaded and typically they don't go to the polls since casting
> their ballot would (as it is made to appear) be worthless.

I don't understand your logic.  If you want "this candidate" to win, 
wouldn't you therefore *vote* for "this candidate" and therefore not be 
lying to the poll-takers?

--George