[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Its over. Maybe
- Subject: [ale] Its over. Maybe
- From: jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)
- Date: Thu Nov 4 00:31:18 2004
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <1099500187.2194.7.camel@blue> <[email protected]> <1099528139.4626.2.camel@blue> <1099531905.10772.44.camel@juanita> <1099533354.4626.40.camel@blue> <1099535141.10772.75.camel@juanita> <1099537558.5108.14.camel@blue> <1099542375.10772.144.camel@juanita> <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 00:14 -0500, Michael Still wrote:
> Ok... I need to clear some things up..
Thanks Michael, very good in-depth insight. I would have to say, given
Tuesdays reports, that Diebold came out much more accurate than the
"scientific" poll takers strategically placed at certain polling
stations.
-Jim P.