[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Its over. Maybe
- Subject: [ale] Its over. Maybe
- From: jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)
- Date: Wed Nov 3 22:06:59 2004
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <1099500187.2194.7.camel@blue> <[email protected]> <1099528139.4626.2.camel@blue> <1099531905.10772.44.camel@juanita> <1099533354.4626.40.camel@blue> <1099535141.10772.75.camel@juanita> <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 21:44 -0500, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> So far, the "mechanics" that have seen the voting machine prototypes
> and/or older models have all said the system is crap. And the mechanics
> have been systematically denied access to "under the hood".
Not true. The SAIC report from Maryland, based on the Diebold
AccuVote-TS, states that the SAIC staff had access to the machine and
souce code. In that report they exonerate Diebold and place
responsibility on implementation and managerial processes.
-Jim P.