[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon May 17 13:59:05 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: zuvefpu ng ahoevqtrf.pbz ([vpunry R. Vvefpu) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected]-weyr.local -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] sshd resource intensive?? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon May 17 13:59:05 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: mhirsch at nubridges.com (Michael D. Hirsch)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00670.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00663.html">[email protected]</a>> <[email protected]-weyr.local> <<a href="msg00670.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] sshd resource intensive??</li>
Looks like you're on a 100Mbit network and your transfer has maxed out the
network. Since there is a factor of eight slowdown with ssh (800%, not
8000%) you can solve the problem by switching to a 10MBit network. Both
transfers should take about the same time on that network. :-)
Seriously, I found that over a T1, ssh would take up a couple of percent of
the CPU. (This was a couple of years ago--it should be less with a modern
CPU.) That does make the numbers you're getting a little higher than I would
expect. At 1% of a CPU for T1 speed, I'd expect 10% at 10-baseT and 100% for
100-baseT. Seems like our numbers disagree by a factor of 10.
Michael
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00702" href="msg00702.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00663" href="msg00663.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00666" href="msg00666.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dragon at atlantacon.org (Drag0n)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00670" href="msg00670.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00697.html">[ale] X running excruciatingly slow</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00699.html">[ale] Penguinfest?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00670.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00702.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00698"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00698"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>