[no subject]

> I have never put any thought to how resource intensive scp might be. 
> Until now.  I was setting up a couple of boxes and testing file transfer 
> rates.  I've noted that for a couple of older boxes (p200 and PII 350) 
> it's much slower.  I then fired up top while the transfer was going 
> along and noted sshd taking up quite a bit of cpu.
> 
> Is this other's experiences as well, or am I missing something?

-c blowfish

(default 3des is much slower than blowfish)

later,
chris


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00680" href="msg00680.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00663" href="msg00663.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00676.html">[ale] Kernel Panic</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00678.html">[ale] X running excruciatingly slow</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00674.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00680.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00677"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00677"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>