[no subject]

I surely expected some degradation in transmission because of the ssh 
overhead, but certainly not 8000%.  11 seconds to transfer a 125M file 
from an athlon 2400+ to pentium IV 2.4G, verses 92 seconds to transfer 
the same file from the athlon to a PII 350.

You learn something new every day..

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey                     Registered Linux User #108567
Building secure systems in spite of Microsoft


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00698" href="msg00698.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mhirsch at nubridges.com (Michael D. Hirsch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00663" href="msg00663.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00666" href="msg00666.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dragon at atlantacon.org (Drag0n)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00669.html">[ale] Transport</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00671.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00666.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00698.html">[ale] sshd resource intensive??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00670"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00670"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>