[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu May 6 16:14:55 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: ehazna ng fcrrqsnpgbel.arg (Uert) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 001901c433a6$6eb91eb0$0c00a8c0@canwebdev -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Suse 9.1 Consortium # 1 - closed -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu May 6 16:14:55 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: runman at speedfactory.net (Greg)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00193.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Suse 9.1 Consortium # 1 - closed</li>
Also, since I am the sole dictator ..er director of the Consortium I would
like to announce that a spot has opened up. Mr. VanWierren's membership has
been terminated with due diligence and we now have an opening ... for a
member more appreciative of my 2 cycles of thought.
just kidding.
So are we going to wait to see if Mr. Suse/Novell can bring us a copy of
Suse Professional 9.1 to the ALE Central Meeting ? ... or should we go ahead
and purchase our own copy asap ??
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:ale-bounces">mailto:ale-bounces</a> at ale.org]On Behalf Of Eric
VanWieren
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 9:00 AM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] Suse 9.1 Consortium # 1 - closed
Yup, it is a shame..
If you would have given it more thought we would probably ended up with
something cool like this:
The group of linux users who are openminded but cheap and do not want to
have to pay high prices for open source free software and since we are a
loosly formed group well i think we are a group that desires to team up to
purchase and distribute for reduced cost to its members a copy of suse linux
9.1 because if you think we are all going to pay $90 for an update and not a
full release you have to be out of your mind so we are just a cheap
consortium of fillibustering aspiring degenerating linux users who are
cheap.
Yup. I agree. Consortium is so weak when compared to a group name like
that. Next time try and give it more thought. We would really appreciate
your due diligence.
Have a nice day
Eric
Greg wrote:
Actually I just called it the first psuedo-cool thing that came to mind, as
opposed to "Cabel" or "Cartel" or "Combine" or "Purchase Alliance" or some
such thing. I just wanted a subject line that would help me pick out the
stuff immediately. I only used about 2 cycles of thought on it.
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:ale-bounces">mailto:ale-bounces</a> at ale.org]On Behalf Of
Matthew Brown
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:16 PM
To: 'Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts'
Subject: RE: [ale] Suse 9.1 Consortium # 1 - closed
Thanks again, Cap'n.
Matthew Brown
(888) 681-2262 . (770) 795-0089 .
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cordata.com">http://www.cordata.com</a>
* Windows and Linux Networks
* Anti-virus
* Security
* Email
* Web Development & Hosting
* Application Development & Hosting
-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:ale-bounces">mailto:ale-bounces</a> at ale.org] On Behalf
Of Geoffrey
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:13 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Cc: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com
Subject: Re: [ale] Suse 9.1 Consortium # 1 - closed
Matthew Brown wrote:
One question: Even though I signed up to share the cost of buying one
copy of SUSE 9.1, I must have missed the initial post on this. Why is
this a consortium?
1 : an agreement, combination, or group (as of companies) formed to
undertake an enterprise beyond the resources of any one member
--
Until later, Geoffrey Registered Linux User #108567
Building secure systems in spite of Microsoft
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00276" href="msg00276.html">[ale] Suse 9.1 Consortium # 1 - closed</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00193" href="msg00193.html">[ale] Suse 9.1 Consortium # 1 - closed</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ale at codex.org (Eric VanWieren)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00220.html">[ale] Re: Suse 9.1 Pro posted to tux.org, please be considerate!!</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00222.html">[ale] Re: Suse 9.1 Pro posted to tux.org, please be considerate!!</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00193.html">[ale] Suse 9.1 Consortium # 1 - closed</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00276.html">[ale] Suse 9.1 Consortium # 1 - closed</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00221"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00221"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>