[no subject]

Wouldn't a straight "yum -y update" accomplish the same thing, and 
considerably faster to boot, since it wouldn't try to check for updated 
headers with every iteration of the loop?

 - Pizza
-- 
Solomon Peachy        				 ICQ: 1318344
Melbourne, FL 					 JID: pitha at myjabber.net
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available



</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00156" href="msg00156.html">[ale] Yum automatic updates</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00153" href="msg00153.html">[ale] Yum automatic updates</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00154.html">[ale] OT: [Fwd: Outsourcing: What does that have to do with me?]</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00156.html">[ale] Yum automatic updates</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00153.html">[ale] Yum automatic updates</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00156.html">[ale] Yum automatic updates</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00155"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00155"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>