[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-date: Tue May 4 18:33:16 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: gserrzna ng vagry.qvtvpurz.arg (gserrzna ng vagry.qvtvpurz.arg) -->
- <!--x-message-id: Pine.LNX.4.44.0405041744490.10654-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-subject: [ale] RH9/General modules setup question -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue May 4 18:33:16 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: tfreeman at intel.digichem.net (tfreeman at intel.digichem.net)</li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] RH9/General modules setup question</li>
Background. I purchased a Haupphauge TV/Radio card a few weeks ago, and
have it running with the application xawtv. Well, I also have a usb web
cam or three lying around, so I started plugging them in. And in a
fashion, I have both the web cam and the TV capture board coexisting, and
expect to be able to add another web cam just for the excess of it. Sort
of.
The rub comes after a reboot. If I boot the system, access the TV card,
and then plug in the first web cam everything cooperates nicely. However,
reboot the system and just plug in the usb web cam can lead to trouble, as
the
web cam grabs /dev/video0, which the TV card expects to get. I have
managed (some how) to get both the web cam and the TV card to fight and
slow the system down to a crawl once, although I don't know exactly _how_
I did that and haven't been able to recreate it.
What I want to do is specify that the TV card will attach and service
/dev/video0, while the web cam(s) line up with /dev/video[12345]. My
/etc/modules.conf file has the line "alias char-major-81 bttv" already, on
the advice of the bttv-HOWTO, which allows the bttv module & others to
dynamically load when starting xawtv.
In addition to having the video devices line up _my_ way, I'd like to
understand how the kernel attaches a device module to a /dev/* entry.
Additionally, how useful is the alias command (example above) to setting
up a module to manage a specific device?
Hopefully this has all made sense to somebody. Your help and listening is
appreciated.
FWIW - I gather that this sort of challenge is part of what the (?) devfs
file system is supposed to address.
--
=============================================
If you think Education is expensive
Try Ignorance
Author Unknown
============================================
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00133" href="msg00133.html">[ale] RH9/General modules setup question</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00129.html">[ale] Linux used by South African Airways</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00131.html">[ale] Getting around blocking software</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00142.html">[ale] Huh? Red Hat Returns to Linux Desktop Market</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00133.html">[ale] RH9/General modules setup question</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00130"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00130"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>