[ale] Seth Nickell - Design Fu : mono

[matthew.brown at cordata.com (Matthew Brown)]

"I'm sure such a facility could easily be created in Java as well. "

ROFL!!!!  It'd be easy if you were Microsoft and had the inards in front of
you.  For everyone else it's completely unprofitable.


Matthew Brown                CorData, Inc.
==========================================
o:    770-795-0089 ...or... 888-681-2262
e:    matthew.brown at cordata.com
www:  www.cordata.com
==========================================
Linux / Open Source Solutions for Business

-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of
Christopher Fowler
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 12:19 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] Seth Nickell - Design Fu : mono

On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 12:04, Geoffrey wrote:
> Christopher Fowler wrote:
> > My only thing about C# is that it is too much like Java. Java can be 
> > considered IMHO as prior art.
> 
> So where is Sun on this?  You'd think they'd jump on that one, since 
> Java is not open source.
> 

I've done Java and tried C# and honestly I can not tell much of a
difference.  One nice thing about C# is that you can interface with all the
Windows API's. I'm sure such a facility could easily be created in Java as
well.  C# does not aim to be portable so I do not understand the need for
byte-code class files.  Compile the source straight to metal and forget
about the other stuff.  The only benefit of the byte-code would be for the
transmission and dealing with objects as data.


_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale