[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sat Jul 31 12:24:56 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: hcf ng gerr.pbz (Egrcuna Gcubss) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Tape RAID? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sat Jul 31 12:24:56 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: ups at tree.com (Stephan Uphoff)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: Your message of "31 Jul 2004 10:05:10 EDT." <<a href="msg00815.html">[email protected]</a>> </li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Tape RAID?</li>
You might want to look at (old?) IEEE mass storage conference proceedings.
Tape set scheduling to combine multiple tapes for striping was a
constant theme.
Are you sure you get full speed out of a single drive right now?
Good buffering can improve speeds considerable.
Sometimes writing a backup image to a staging drive first also helps.
While a HD is faster than a Tape - seeking or complex operations needed for
a backup (checksum of large files) can cause huge changes in data rate.
Normally the backup will wait for the tape - but in between the tape will empty
all data buffers. Then the tape has to stop, wind back a bit, speed up ...
Not good for speed or the tape media.
This looks like something to implement in user space as a multi-threaded
utility
to me.
It might also a good idea to write a test utility first that consumes data at
a configurable
rate and sends it to /dev/null and counts the number buffer underruns.
With the test utility you can check the cost/time benefit of different
solutions.
Stephan
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00815" href="msg00815.html">[ale] Tape RAID?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00816.html">[ale] Tape RAID?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00818.html">[ale] Can't connect to services with DSL connection</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00815.html">[ale] Tape RAID?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00816.html">[ale] Tape RAID?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00817"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00817"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>