[no subject]

Such a company policy should simply be supported by blocking the access. 
  After 26 years with AT&T, I assure you I've seen my share of 'logic 
immunity' as well as 'draconian IT regimes.'

I do suggest that if Jeff hasn't already done so, approach the 
'authorities' with logical reasoning.

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey                     Registered Linux User #108567
Building secure systems in spite of Microsoft


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00650" href="msg00650.html">OT: Google the new RTFM (Was: Re: [ale] Internet Access	aroundAtlanta)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> PBoyington at polyengineering.com (Preston Boyington)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00652" href="msg00652.html">OT: Google the new RTFM (Was: Re: [ale] Internet	Access	aroundAtlanta)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00654" href="msg00654.html">OT: Google the new RTFM (Was: Re: [ale]	Internet	Access	aroundAtlanta)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> pete.hardie at sciatl.com (Pete Hardie)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00665.html">[ale] Internet Access around Atlanta</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00667.html">[ale] OT: slow back-UPS</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00654.html">OT: Google the new RTFM (Was: Re: [ale]	Internet	Access	aroundAtlanta)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00671.html">OT: Google the new RTFM (Was: Re: [ale] Internet Access	aroundAtlanta)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00666"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00666"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>