[no subject]

I know of MRTG but it seems to me that it is relly only useful for
monitoring the total traffic on each network device. 

-- 

I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money than it is at making good operating systems.  -- Linus Torvalds


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00470" href="msg00470.html">[ale] Graphing protocol activity?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> fletch at phydeaux.org (Fletch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00465.html">[ale] Emory problems -- still</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00467.html">[ale] Emory problems -- still</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00469.html">[ale] Emory problems -- still</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00470.html">[ale] Graphing protocol activity?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00466"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00466"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>