[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 7/11/2004 at 1:57 PM Christopher R. Curzio wrote:
>> You are mistaken on many points. The original Constitution is a
>> singular irreplaceable document that is also extrememly fragile, and
>> those measures are designed to protect it.
>
>I understand that, but you missed the entire point of the analogy.
I don't think I did.
> I would
>argue that the original document, while it would suck tremendously if
>lost, is easily replacable. There are billions of copies of the original
>text out there. Our government wouldn't collapse if the original paper
>copy of the constitution burned up.
No, the government won't collapse, but it would be a disaster of historical
proportions. And no, the original cannot be replaced. A duplicate, and
most likely a very poor duplicate, can be created but the original cannot
be 'replaced'.
>> By the way, you are not restricted from making copies of the gift-shop
>> purchase either, though the cost of the copy available at the gift-shop
>> should not be profit-making either as it should only be enough to cover
>> just the production and distribution costs involved for the purchase.
>No, there is a profit motive there; much of the costs go into maintaining
>those security measures of which you spoke, along with the facilities
>themselves, paying the staff, etc.
I stand corrected; as long as it creates less burden on taxpayers, you are
right that they should seek to recoup as much costs as possible in this
manner.
>> Other than a few hundredths of a cent for distribution,
>> what costs are involved with the production (paid for by tax dollars)
>> and the distribution (also paid for by tax dollars *and* also volunteer
>> mirrors) of an E-Book? We all know the answer is *none*, of course.
>You're assuming that it's the government that is selling this document.
>You're incorrect. Amazon is selling the e-book document, and its publisher
>is NuVision Publications - both of which are for-profit entities. Tax
>dollars don't factor into this equation anywhere.
>The original text was created by the founders of the US
>government, and the e-book of that document was created by NuVision
>Publications using licensed technology from Microsoft - also a for-profit
>entity.
I see now where you are getting NuVision Publications. It wasn't clear on
Amazon's page until I actively sought out the publisher information as a
result of your bringing it to my attention. Amazon should be more clear as
to who is offering the product, rather than claiming it is the government.
>> There should be no charge whatsoever for the U.S. Government
>> produced E-Book, and absolutely no DRM attached to said E-Book.
>
>I agree. But this is not the case here.
I see now. Thank you.
Cheers,
Robert Reese~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
Comment: No one has the right to NOT be offended!
iQA/AwUBQPGfOLw8BOWncaQMEQLlrACdG5ewyA0k9MnnPZFT3UZdktlv6rcAoMFY
tI2dWVg6B6uS2/Axw2D6oVTb
=gmLY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Type: DH/DSS 4096/1024 AES-256
Key ID: 0xA771A40C
Fingerprint: CAE2 81CA A7CD 6681 341C E3A9 BC3C 04E5 A771 A40C
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00331" href="msg00331.html">(OT) Re[2]: [ale] GAH</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ale at accipiter.org (Christopher R. Curzio)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00217" href="msg00217.html">[ale] GAH</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net (Robert L. Harris)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00218" href="msg00218.html">[ale] GAH</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> james at sumners.ath.cx (james at sumners.ath.cx)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00220" href="msg00220.html">[ale] GAH</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> vf5 at plm.gatech.edu (Vincent Fox)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00305" href="msg00305.html">[ale] GAH</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00312" href="msg00312.html">[ale] GAH</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ale at accipiter.org (Christopher R. Curzio)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00313" href="msg00313.html">(OT) Re[2]: [ale] GAH</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ale at sixit.com (Robert Reese)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00319" href="msg00319.html">(OT) Re[2]: [ale] GAH</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ale at accipiter.org (Christopher R. Curzio)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00328.html">[ale] GAH</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00330.html">[ale] GAH</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00319.html">(OT) Re[2]: [ale] GAH</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00331.html">(OT) Re[2]: [ale] GAH</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00329"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00329"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>