[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue Jul 6 00:11:21 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: uoof ng pbzpnfg.arg (Xrss Vhoof) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 1089086974.31340.189.camel@localhost -->
- <!--x-reference: Pine.LNX.4.44.0407052037500.23796-[email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Q: Should Linux swap space depend on number of users? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Jul 6 00:11:21 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Q: Should Linux swap space depend on number of users?</li>
For all practical purposes, swap is user-agnostic. It's a mechanism
that the kernel uses based on the memory consumption of all processes,
regardless of owner.
When I worked briefly with a Linux Terminal Server Project rig, I
noticed that workstations could run different instances of the same app
and each instance took up just a small increment of memory beyond that
of the first one.
- Jeff
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 21:43, John Mills wrote:
> Usage Gurus -
>
> Is swap space shared between users? If so, should one allow more swap when
> expecting to support a number of users compared to only one or two at a
> time? I suppose it doesn't scale simply with user count because a _lot_ of
> processes run the same number of instances regardless of the number of
> users, but should there be some allowance?
>
> TIA for any comments.
>
> - John Mills
> john.m.mills at alum.mit.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00141" href="msg00141.html">[ale] Q: Should Linux swap space depend on number of users?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00145" href="msg00145.html">[ale] Q: Should Linux swap space depend on number of users?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> johnmills at speakeasy.net (John Mills)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00137" href="msg00137.html">[ale] Q: Should Linux swap space depend on number of users?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> johnmills at speakeasy.net (John Mills)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00139.html">[ale] OT: Firewall purchase</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00141.html">[ale] Q: Should Linux swap space depend on number of users?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00137.html">[ale] Q: Should Linux swap space depend on number of users?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00141.html">[ale] Q: Should Linux swap space depend on number of users?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00140"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00140"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>