[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon Jul 5 21:41:27 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: psbjyre ng bhgcbfgfragvary.pbz (Quevfgbcure Tbjyre) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: DECD5A50-CE0E-11D8-B3C8-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: FA340AE5-CECD-11D8-9263-[email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Firewall discussion...hardware horsepower? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon Jul 5 21:41:27 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00129.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00096.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00108.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00129.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Firewall discussion...hardware horsepower?</li>
4 serial ports, 1 10/100, sound, video, 64 DOM, 256m, 800mhz, and
1 PCI slot. Small little box but I believe it costs around $500 in
lots of 1.
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 05:55:06PM -0400, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> Basically, the problem was that if I was logging bad packets, the CPU
> would get overloaded when a particularly large number of logged packets
> came in, such as a particularly virulent portscan. It's very possible
> that it could have been the hard drive (it's an old one, 2.5GB Maxtor,
> ATA33, no DMA), but I don't have another drive available at the moment
> to swap in.
>
> At any rate, I recently acquired a rackmount cabinet, and I'd like to
> get something I can mount in it as opposed to just sitting a Mini-ITX
> case on a shelf; there are Mini-ITX rackmount cases, but they're
> expensive, and for the price I could buy a small standard ATX rackmount
> box and a low-end mobo/cpu combo.
>
> Which brings me to my next question...if I'm looking for low cost and
> high power/heat efficiency, which CPU that goes with a standard ATX
> motherboard would one recommend?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -C
>
> On Jul 5, 2004, at 3:19 AM, Dow Hurst wrote:
>
> >Chris Woodfield wrote:
> >
> >>As an adjunct to the firewall discussion, I'm looking at upgrading
> >>mine...I'm currently running a Via EDEN 500 based box which does
> >>strict packet filtering and connection tracking fine, but starts to
> >>have issues when I turn on any sort of packet logging and/or IDS. I
> >>also would like something I can rackmount in a 1U case.
> >>
> >>Obviously I don't need a 3 GHz Pentium 4 and a gig a RAM for this;
> >>would would be the minimum suggested system to use here? I'm
> >>basically looking to run iptables in a one-to-one NAT config for some
> >>hosts and one-to-many NAT for others, and do blocked packet logging,
> >>snort, and some small servers (DHCP, SNMP for generating MRTG graphs,
> >>and possibly a SOCKS proxypot as well).
> >>
> >>Also, suggestions for cheap 1U rackmount cases are welcome as well
> >>(I'm leaning towards SuperMicro's SC512)...
> >>
> >> Thanks for the input,
> >>
> >>-Chris
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Ale mailing list
> >>Ale at ale.org
> >><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> >>
> >Have you checked with hdparm your disk throughput? I am curious too
> >as to why you are having performance issues. Is it disk or is it CPU
> >related?
> >Dow
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ale mailing list
> >Ale at ale.org
> ><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00096" href="msg00096.html">[ale] Firewall discussion...hardware horsepower?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> rekoil at semihuman.com (Chris Woodfield)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00108" href="msg00108.html">[ale] Firewall discussion...hardware horsepower?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00129" href="msg00129.html">[ale] Firewall discussion...hardware horsepower?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> rekoil at semihuman.com (Chris Woodfield)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00135.html">[ale] OT: Firewall purchase</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00137.html">[ale] Q: Should Linux swap space depend on number of users?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00129.html">[ale] Firewall discussion...hardware horsepower?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00122.html">[ale] KDE, Key settings</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00136"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00136"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>