[no subject]

You are absolutely correct.  It contains known flaws which make it 
substanially less secure than ipsec.  But, you know Microsoft, always 
wanting to rebuild the wheel, their wheel, their way...

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey                     Registered Linux User #108567
Building secure systems in spite of Microsoft


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="01290" href="msg01290.html">[ale] PPTP issue that affects Linux but not Windows?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jb at devsea.com (John Wells)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01313" href="msg01313.html">[ale] PPTP issue that affects Linux but not Windows?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01320.html">[ale] Quick tutorial on ssh port forwarding my mail?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01322.html">[ale] DSPAM</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01313.html">[ale] PPTP issue that affects Linux but not Windows?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01316.html">[ale] PPTP issue that affects Linux but not Windows?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#01321"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#01321"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>