[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Apr 29 12:50:35 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: argjbexe0 ng psy.ee.pbz (Pevna Qunfr) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] redhat 9 ramdrive performance problem -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Apr 29 12:50:35 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: networkr0 at cfl.rr.com (Brian Chase)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg01287.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg01287.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] redhat 9 ramdrive performance problem</li>
Armsby John-G16665 wrote:
> All,
>
> We are setting up an HP ProLiant DL360 server, 1 Gig of ram, mirrored
> disks as our Engineering data server. We had initial problems with
> the machine "seeing" the CDROM, but now all is well. My current
> glitch is with the performance of using a RAMDISK.
>
> I have successfully set up a ramdrive with 500 meg of space,
> initialized it, and placed the files I need to regularly access. I
> have changed the CGI code to look to that directory (/mnt/ramdrive) to
> access the files. I am dismayed to find that the performance is
> actually less than simply using normal disk access.
>
> Previously I have set up an identical configuration on a Dell GX 270,
> 1 Gig of ram, and noticed a 2X increase in performance. I measure
> performance by having the cgi script simply calculate the number of
> seconds it is running. Both machines are running redhat 9, both
> machines are running the identical compiled cgi script. Index files
> are identical.
>
> What am I missing here?
>
>
> John
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="01287" href="msg01287.html">[ale] redhat 9 ramdrive performance problem</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> John.Armsby at motorola.com (Armsby John-G16665)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01292.html">[ale] Forum notify</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01294.html">[ale] Remote X</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01287.html">[ale] redhat 9 ramdrive performance problem</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01311.html">[ale] redhat 9 ramdrive performance problem</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#01293"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#01293"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>