[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon Apr 19 20:07:33 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: qpbeova ng znpughegyr.pbz (Rnivq Qbeova) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] diagnosis -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon Apr 19 20:07:33 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: dcorbin at machturtle.com (David Corbin)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00769.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00645.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00749.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00769.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] diagnosis</li>
Sounds reasonable. Can you point me at such, or if not that, anybody got any
idea where the source to top is and I'll build my own.
>
> It is certainly possible to _add_ a module or _remove_ a module, but
> change out the kernel with out a reboot (unless 2-kernel-monte is
> available, I have not been able to find this :( ). So the actual data
> stream for top is not tamper-able easily. Thus a known good
> statically-linked top would give access to the running system and show
> the _real_ processes that are running.
>
> If top shows no malicious files, it's time to take some snapshots over
> time to plot which app is failing.
>
> #!/bin/sh
> echo date >> /tmp/top.txt
> top -b -n 1 -c >> /tmp/top.txt
> echo "###############" >>/tmp/top.txt
> echo >>/tmp/top.txt
> echo >>/tmp/top.txt
>
> Run as a cron every minute for an hour.
>
> If you want, you can now mash/mangle the data into a nice plot using
> some perl and gnplot (or a spreadsheet).
>
> On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 11:56, Geoffrey wrote:
> > Dow Hurst wrote:
> > > How can we find the process that is soaking the memory? How do you
> > > manipulate /proc to find out the originating process that owns the
> > > memory being used? I know IRIX had tools to look at memory and see
> > > which processes owned what part of memory. Does Linux?
> > >
> > > Seems if you knew what was leaking you would have a major part of the
> > > battle won.
> >
> > I believe we mentioned top, but he noted that doesn't give him anything.
> > That's what concerns me. If it doesn't show, is it being hidden for a
> > reason???
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00784" href="msg00784.html">[ale] diagnosis</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00645" href="msg00645.html">[ale] diagnosis</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dcorbin at machturtle.com (David Corbin)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00749" href="msg00749.html">[ale] diagnosis</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00769" href="msg00769.html">[ale] diagnosis</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00781.html">[ale] diagnosis</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00783.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00769.html">[ale] diagnosis</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00784.html">[ale] diagnosis</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00782"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00782"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>