[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon Apr 19 13:19:11 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: tebhcf ng [email protected] ([email protected]) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: BAY8-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] (no subject) SPAM talk... -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon Apr 19 13:19:11 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00744.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00722.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00732.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00744.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</li>
My desire is to stop receiving spam due to email harvesting from the ALE
archives, or at least not have a situation where we allow harvesting and have
members simultaniously complain about spam. (The other ALE spam problem seems
to be easily solved by simply dropping any message with an attachment - but
that probably won't become policy).
Recently, you (again) implied that obfuscation "is a waste of time." You said
" If you remove the email address from the archive, you're removing a
great part of it's value." Briefly skimming your posted "solution" it seems
as though some effort will have to be done on each client to make the
solution work :( My interpretation of all of your posts is that in the
FUTURE "global" spam "solution," email addresses will still be left
unobfuscated and laid bare in the ALE archives - ripe for harvesting.
My question (and this post) can be answered with a simple YES/NO answer (save
the personal attacks for future posts). I have thought up various contingency
plans for either answer that I can impliment server and/or client-side, but
I'd like to know the answer so that I know what steps I need to take.
When the future spam solution has been implimented, will unobfuscated email
addresses be contained in the archives?
--
Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
Drew Brown
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ChangingLINKS.com">http://www.ChangingLINKS.com</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00722" href="msg00722.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> baron_shatturday at hotmail.com (William Wylde)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00732" href="msg00732.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> retief at larp.com (Jay Finch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00744" href="msg00744.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00754.html">[ale] [OT] earthlink - results</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00756.html">[ale] Linux Cluster Server Room</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00744.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00757.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00755"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00755"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>