[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sun Apr 18 23:52:53 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wxancxn ng xarheb.arg (Xbr Yancxn) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] How much can one Linux machine do? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sun Apr 18 23:52:53 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00648.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00648.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] How much can one Linux machine do?</li>
> currently runing a apache server, email, desktop workstation and ftp
> on one machine. Probably a few other things also. Hey, it is just a
> learning tool/toy. I just wonder at what point will I start to
> notice something. By the way it is just a 850MHz machine .
*Just* an 850MHz machine, he says. Why, back in the day we ran Linux
on 25MHz 486sx's powered by hamsters! And we loved it! You can't even
*boot* Windows on a hamster-powered box these days...
Seriously, you're a *long* way from noticing any performance issues,
if by "desktop workstation" you mean word-processing and spreadsheet
kind of stuff. RAM will make a *much* bigger difference to perceived
performance than CPU will. Most of the apps you mention above are
interactive - they only need CPU cycles when the user is actually
doing something. As long as you have enough RAM, you'll probably never
notice the difference between a 200Hz machine and a 800MHz machine
during desktop use. When you start using stuff that actually needs CPU
cycles, like the Gimp's image transforms, kernel builds, or some
games, *then* you'll start to notice the difference.
As another data point, the machine I'm writing this on is a 233MHz
PentiumII laptop with 196MB of RAM. I am absolutely delighted with
this machine's performance under Linux. I keep Emacs and Mozilla (with
about ten browser tabs) open *always*. I often also have a couple of
Xpdf viewers, a Gimp or a SodiPodi, and perhaps a Maelstrom or
FrozenBubble window. The machine rarely even hesitates when switching
apps. It's running RedHat 8, though I may upgrade it to Fedora
sometime.
Cheers,
-- Joe
--
Resist the feed.
--
If you really want to get my attention, send mail to
jknapka .at. kneuro .dot. net.
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00735" href="msg00735.html">[ale] How much can one Linux machine do?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> tfreeman at intel.digichem.net (tfreeman at intel.digichem.net)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00648" href="msg00648.html">[ale] How much can one Linux machine do?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> adrin at haswes.homelinux.org (H. Adrin Story)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00710.html">[ale] OT: DSL in older house (no NID)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00712.html">[ale] Re: Your archive</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00656.html">[ale] How much can one Linux machine do?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00735.html">[ale] How much can one Linux machine do?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00711"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00711"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>