[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sat Apr 17 17:21:39 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wvzcbc ng lnubb.pbz (Xvz Bbcbivgpu) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 1082236921.7751.8.camel@blue -->
- <!--x-reference: BAY8-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] (no subject) SPAM talk... -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sat Apr 17 17:21:39 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00674.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00620.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00654.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00666.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00670.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00674.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</li>
I propose that we unsub Drew/ChangingLINKS so that he is removed from
his problems. If we do this, I personally volunteer to edit the ALE
archives and remove every instance of Drew's email address.
Drew, do you still reside in Dallas, TX?
-Jim P.
On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 17:15, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 15:39, ChangingLINKS.com wrote:
> > > You miss my point. If it is programatically obscured it can be
> > > recovered. You substitute "at" or "(at)" or "( at )", and it's
> > > nothing to undo (c.f. the previous script).
> > > --
> > > Fletch | "If you find my answers frightening, __`'/|
> >
> > I understand what you have said clearly.
> > While I disagree that spammers will harvest in this way for reasons mentioned
> > earlier:
> > 1. I think it is bad policy to simply offer the email addresses plainly.
> > 2. I feel that the ike server solution is sufficient.
> > 3. We can simply replace email addresses with member IDs keyed in a very
> > simple mySQL database.
> >
> > Harvest that.
> >
> > The latter solution will even stop the M$ spam problems. The only drawback is
> > that the user would need to pass email via the ALE server to contact other
> > members INITIALLY. However ALL ALE spam problems would be eraticated.
>
> As the ALE list archives are a matter of public record, they serve a
> useful public service when a non-ale person does a Google search
> concerning a problem they are having and finds the solution on the ALE
> archives.
>
> This is a good reason to NOT close the archives to non-subscribers.
> Besides, a spammer only has to subscribe, suck out the emails from the
> archives, unsubscribe and blast away.
>
> There is NO SOLUTION to this problem that will not have a detrimental
> effect that may be greater than the initial problem. Fletch has
> demonstrated that obfuscation is not an answer.
>
> About once a month, I get an email from someone I have never seen on the
> ALE list. They found my address through a Google search of the ALE
> archives and saw my name as someone who had worked on/helped with/solved
> a problem similar to one they are having. I do not want that secondary
> exposure to what capabilities I have to offer to go away just because
> some bad guys are out there.
>
> As the people who do spam studies have found that the vast bulk of spam
> originates from 3-4 people, the removal of those 3-4 people from access
> to computer technology would have a tremendous effect on the global spam
> volume. Eventually, someone with more access to legal prowess than
> anyone on this list will get tired of waiting for the neutered lawmakers
> to put these 3-4 people someplace where they are no longer capable of
> doing their garbage. When that happens, I hope it looks like something
> from the end of Fargo except feet first.
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00677" href="msg00677.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> runman at speedfactory.net (Greg)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00686" href="msg00686.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00620" href="msg00620.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> baron_shatturday at hotmail.com (William Wylde)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00654" href="msg00654.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00666" href="msg00666.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> fletch at phydeaux.org (Fletch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00670" href="msg00670.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00674" href="msg00674.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00674.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00676.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00674.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00677.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00675"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00675"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>