[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sat Apr 17 13:30:05 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: syrgpu ng culqrnhk.bet (Tyrgpu) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: BAY8-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] (no subject) SPAM talk... -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sat Apr 17 13:30:05 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: fletch at phydeaux.org (Fletch)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00654.html">[email protected]</a>> (ChangingLINKS com's message of "Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:26:51 -0500")</li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00620.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00636.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00647.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00654.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</li>
[...]
ChangingLINKS> Good. *not* to be a smartass, but please take the
ChangingLINKS> same amount of effort to write the script Chris
ChangingLINKS> Farris requested to obfuscate the email addresses.
[...]
ChangingLINKS> However, you are focused on the ALE
ChangingLINKS> archives. Spammers are focused on the Internet. The
ChangingLINKS> difference is that there are millions of sites to
ChangingLINKS> be concerned with slogging. Moreover there are many
ChangingLINKS> different ways to obfuscate an email address. For
ChangingLINKS> example, many people use user at NOSPAMdomain.com. How
ChangingLINKS> long would it take you to write a program to
ChangingLINKS> decipher all of the different methods? 1-1000
ChangingLINKS> hours?
You miss my point. If it is programatically obscured it can be
recovered. You substitute "at" or "(at)" or "( at )", and it's
nothing to undo (c.f. the previous script).
You can put "NOSPAM" on the domain and I can get it with something
like: s/(\S at .*?)(?i:nospam)(.*?\.(?:.{2,3})+)/$1$2/. You can add an
extra fake domain for foo at yahoo.fake.com and I can rip it out
similarly. You can intersperse it as "uNsOeSrPnAmMe" and I can just:
s/(.+?)[Nn](.+?)[Oo](.+?)[Ss](.+?)[Pp](.+?)[Aa](.+?)[Mm]@(.+)/$1$2$3$4$5$6@$7/
Or use "REMOVEME" for "RuEsMeOrVnEaMmEe", or any other variation on
the theme. "&#ddd;" encode all the characters and I just have to pass
it through another function, one more line of code. No matter what I
could do to an address a determined person will be able to recover it.
Given a reasonable sample (10-15) of obscured addresses, a marginally
skilled regexp writer will be able to undo it fairly easily. There's
only so many ways you can textually manipulate "foo at domain.com", and
spammers have probably already spent many hours undoing the common
ones.
Not to mention the more elaborate the obfuscation, the more of a pain
it will be for non-harvesters to use as well. You're attempting to
stop an 18-wheeler rolling down a hill by tossing a twig in front of
it. By the time you get a big enough obstacle you're going to have
halted legitimate users as well.
--
Fletch | "If you find my answers frightening, __`'/|
fletch at phydeaux.org | Vincent, you should cease askin' \ o.O'
| scary questions." -- Jules =(___)=
| U
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00670" href="msg00670.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00701" href="msg00701.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00620" href="msg00620.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> baron_shatturday at hotmail.com (William Wylde)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00636" href="msg00636.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00647" href="msg00647.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> fletch at phydeaux.org (Fletch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00654" href="msg00654.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00665.html">[ale] diagnosis</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00667.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00683.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00670.html">[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00666"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00666"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>