[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Fri Apr 16 16:12:52 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: ehazna ng fcrrqsnpgbel.arg (Uert) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 003501c423eb$f9f05360$0a00a8c0@canwebdev -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Woof -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Fri Apr 16 16:12:52 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: runman at speedfactory.net (Greg)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00581.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Woof</li>
The decision on when you are in danger is one a court gets to decide. The
courts have decided over and over that killing/injuring someone when only
loss of property is involved is illegal. Live has higher value and is not
to be taken lightly - so killing or injuring someone involved in the process
of trespass or breaking/entering is illegal. Even putting up signs to that
effect is inconsequential.
Greg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ale-bounces at ale.org [<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:ale-bounces">mailto:ale-bounces</a> at ale.org]On Behalf Of
> dragon
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 11:35 AM
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> Subject: Re: [ale] Woof
>
>
> Even if I do leave my door open, it is within my right to put a slug in
> them for trespassing. Hence the diferentiation of breaking and entering,
> they are 2 different crimes. Criminal trespass is one companies like
> because it does not require securing the premises.
>
> Drag0n
>
>
>
>
> Charles Shapiro wrote:
> > If you leave your door open, you don't know what kind of people will
> > wander into your house.
> >
> > -- CHS
> >
> > On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 11:15, Geoffrey wrote:
> >
> >>Robert L. Harris wrote:
> >>
> >>><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0415earthfinds.html">http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0415earthfinds.html</a>
> >>
> >>What I don't understand about all this spyware crap is why it's not
> >>illegal. There's one spyware company suing out in Calif. because they
> >>claim it's there right, freedom of advertising.
> >>
> >>How about illegal trespass??? GET OFF MY COMPUTER!!
> >
> > !
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00612" href="msg00612.html">[ale] Woof</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> freemyer-ml at NorcrossGroup.com (Greg Freemyer)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00581" href="msg00581.html">[ale] Woof</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dragon at atlantacon.org (dragon)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00610.html">[ale] OT: DSL in older house (no NID)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00612.html">[ale] Woof</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00581.html">[ale] Woof</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00612.html">[ale] Woof</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00611"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00611"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>