[no subject]

> The group had wired all the desktop jacks EIA568B and the patchpanel punchdowns 
> 568A. This was Saturday AM we finally diagnosed it, with a monday morning live 
> date. I grabbed a 110 punchdown tool and re-terminated all the punchdowns on 
> the patch panel. That was my first time using a punchdown tool, and probably my 
> last. I didn't give the cabling company good references, and don't recommend 
> "remote controlling" projects. You have to be able verify what's going on long 
> before a live data. 

We had exactly the same thing happen a couple of months ago down in Florida.
I wonder just how commonplace that sort of confusion is, given the two
different standards?

later,
chris


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00319" href="msg00319.html">[ale] OT: GigE Copper specs</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> griffisb at bellsouth.net (griffisb at bellsouth.net)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00365.html">[ale] [OT] Digital camera fix</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00367.html">[ale] ALE NE meeting?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00319.html">[ale] OT: GigE Copper specs</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00339.html">[ale] OT: GigE Copper specs</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00366"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00366"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>