[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sun Apr 11 03:37:21 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wxancxn ng xarheb.arg (Xbr Yancxn) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1080962610.25003.10.camel@devel -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] [OT] Digital camera fix -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sun Apr 11 03:37:21 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00329.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <[email protected]> <1080962610.25003.10.camel@devel> <<a href="msg00329.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] [OT] Digital camera fix</li>
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:23:30PM -0500 Chris Fowler <cfowler at outpostsentinel.com> wrote:
> > It depends on features of the unit. You can get 3MP cameras now for
> > $200. If your is less I would simply throw away and buy a 8MP DSLR.
>
> Sure, a Nikon D100 is only $1400, and a D1x is about $2100 (camera
> bodies only). But the D70 is about $1300, and it even includes a
> 27-80mm/f3.5 lens! And those are the 6-7mp cameras. What a deal!
>
> Actually, expensive as they are, if you normally shoot a lot of film,
> like 50-100 rolls every week or two, the camera pays for itself
> rather quickly. I guess you could invest in a 35mm film scanner
> rather than in a DSLR. But, there's the exif info and the exposure
> histograms that the Digicams keep for you too...
It would probably take me twenty years to shoot 50 rolls of
film. A $1400 camera is so far beyond my needs that I can
hardly conceive of why anyone would want such a thing.
I have heard that Sony can be really nice about repairing
broken stuff, though. I'm going to call them and ask nicely.
-- Joe
--
Resist the feed.
--
If you really want to get my attention, send mail to
jknapka .at. kneuro .dot. net.
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00332" href="msg00332.html">[ale] [OT] Digital camera fix</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> marvindickens at bellsouth.net (Marvin Dickens)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00076" href="msg00076.html">[ale] [OT] Digital camera fix</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00079" href="msg00079.html">[ale] [OT] Digital camera fix</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00329" href="msg00329.html">[ale] [OT] Digital camera fix</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> deepbsd at earthlink.net (David S. Jackson)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00329.html">[ale] [OT] Digital camera fix</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00331.html">[ale] Memory leak (hacked?)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00329.html">[ale] [OT] Digital camera fix</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00332.html">[ale] [OT] Digital camera fix</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00330"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00330"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>