[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Apr 1 13:31:43 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: psbjyre ng bhgcbfgfragvary.pbz (Quevfgbcure Tbjyre) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Speed comparison -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Apr 1 13:31:43 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00047.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00047.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Speed comparison</li>
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 13:12, Stephan Uphoff wrote:
> You might want to upgrade to an Athlon with a 512K L2 cache.
> Example: AMD Athlon XP 2500+ 1.83GHz 333FSB 512KB - $80 + Free shipping
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=80170-R">http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=80170-R</a>
>
> > I'm looking in the lates dirty magazine (Computer User). We call them
> > the dirty magazine because of the lust they create. I guess I can get an
> > XP-2400+ for $74.99 and a PIV 2.4 for $145.99 Is there any difference
> > that warrants double price?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 06:06, Geoffrey wrote:
> > > Marvin Dickens wrote:
> > > >>> It does not, the P4s, especially the celerons are dogs. I have a
> > > >>> 1.8 GHz celeron and I swear my 800 MHz Athlon runs rings around
> > > >>> it. I've been underwhelmed by the p4 since there were introduced.
> > > >>> Any processor that is slower per clock tick than the previous
> > > >>> generation has something dreadfully wrong. If you must do P4,
> > > >>> get a real one, not the celeron.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks. It looks as if I'll be skipping the system due to the
> > > >> Intel tax. The XP must be better.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > FWIW, I always go with AMD. The only disadvantage I know of is that
> > > > AMD processors are destroyed in the event of an unnoticed CPU fan
> > > > failure occurs. OTOH, the Intel chips automatically shut themselves
> > > > down when a fan failure occurs and the temperature rises too high.
> > >
> > > They now have athlon mb that will shutdown in the same way. I've got
> > > two, but I've not tested it. :)
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> >
>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00050" href="msg00050.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dhurst at kennesaw.edu (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00047" href="msg00047.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ups at tree.com (Stephan Uphoff)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00047.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00049.html">[ale] sort key help request</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00047.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00050.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00048"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00048"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>