[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 13:12, Stephan Uphoff wrote:
> You might want to upgrade to an Athlon with a 512K L2 cache.
>    Example:  AMD Athlon XP 2500+ 1.83GHz 333FSB 512KB - $80 + Free shipping
&gt;    <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=80170-R";>http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=80170-R</a>
&gt; 
&gt; &gt; I'm looking in the lates dirty magazine (Computer User).  We call them
&gt; &gt; the dirty magazine because of the lust they create. I guess I can get an
&gt; &gt; XP-2400+ for $74.99 and a PIV 2.4 for $145.99  Is there any difference
&gt; &gt; that warrants double price?
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 06:06, Geoffrey wrote:
&gt; &gt; &gt; Marvin Dickens wrote:
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; It does not, the P4s, especially the celerons are dogs.  I have a
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; 1.8 GHz celeron and I swear my 800 MHz Athlon runs rings around
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; it. I've been underwhelmed by the p4 since there were introduced.
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; Any processor that is slower per clock tick than the previous
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; generation has something dreadfully wrong.  If you must do P4,
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; get a real one, not the celeron.
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; Thanks.  It looks as if I'll be skipping the system due to the
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; Intel tax.  The XP must be better.
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; FWIW, I always go with AMD. The only disadvantage I know of is that 
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; AMD processors are destroyed in the event of an unnoticed CPU fan
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; failure occurs. OTOH, the Intel chips automatically shut themselves
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; down when a fan failure occurs and the temperature rises too high.
&gt; &gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; &gt; They now have athlon mb that will shutdown in the same way.  I've got 
&gt; &gt; &gt; two, but I've not tested it. :)
&gt; &gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; &gt; Ale mailing list
&gt; &gt; Ale at ale.org
&gt; &gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; 


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00050" href="msg00050.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dhurst at kennesaw.edu (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00047" href="msg00047.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ups at tree.com (Stephan Uphoff)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00047.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00049.html">[ale] sort key help request</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00047.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00050.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00048"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00048"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>