[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Apr 1 09:02:24 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: owbea ng fppf.fjneguzber.rqh (Pwbea Rvggzre-Dbpur) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected]-a-geek.com -->
- <!--x-reference: 1080785109.20913.123.camel@devel -->
- <!--x-reference: 00d601c4178f$65caacc0$53e04fd8@harclaptop -->
- <!--x-reference: 1080786082.20915.133.camel@devel -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Speed comparison -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Apr 1 09:02:24 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: bjorn at sccs.swarthmore.edu (Bjorn Dittmer-Roche)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <1080785109.20913.123.camel@devel> <00d601c4178f$65caacc0$53e04fd8@harclaptop> <1080786082.20915.133.camel@devel> <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Speed comparison</li>
> > > It does not, the P4s, especially the celerons are dogs. I have a 1.8 GHz
> > > celeron and I swear my 800 MHz Athlon runs rings around it.
> > > I've been underwhelmed by the p4 since there were introduced. Any
> > > processor that is slower per clock tick than the previous generation has
> > > something dreadfully wrong. If you must do P4, get a real one, not the
> > > celeron.
> >
> > Thanks. It looks as if I'll be skipping the system due to the Intel
> > tax. The XP must be better.
>
> FWIW, I always go with AMD. The only disadvantage I know of is that
> AMD processors are destroyed in the event of an unnoticed CPU fan failure
> occurs. OTOH, the Intel chips automatically shut themselves down when a fan
> failure occurs and the temperature rises too high.
>
> I remedy this problem by monitoring the temp of the chip (Via ACPI...) and
> when the temp rises to a preset value (This value is below the temperature
> that would damage the chip), a script sends me an email. If I miss
> the email and the temperature continues to rise, the script shuts the machine
> down once a higher preset temp is reached (Still below any temperature that
> can damage the chip. I have not lost a single machine using this script in 4
> years. Although, I've lost a couple of CPU fans...).
Scarry. I think my bios offers such features (although I'm sure shutdown
isn't super graceful...). What temperatures do you use as your warning and
shutdown? What do you consider a safe temp for an AMD processor? (I've got
an AMD 1735MHz, I think that's a 2100+)
maybe you could post your script? I'm sure it would be easy enough to
reproduce, but rather than reinvent the wheel......
thanks for your comments.
bjorn
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00025" href="msg00025.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00012.html">[ale] OT:E-Commerce templates</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00014.html">[ale] AOPEN Burner</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00071.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00025.html">[ale] Speed comparison</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00013"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00013"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>