[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Simple steps Re: [ale] Another SSH Release?
- Subject: Simple steps Re: [ale] Another SSH Release?
- From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)
- Date: Wed Sep 17 12:31:59 2003
- In-reply-to: <1063815053.2026.20.camel@blue>
- References: <[email protected]> <1063811296.2567.5.camel@blue> <[email protected]> <1063814002.2022.5.camel@blue> <[email protected]> <1063815053.2026.20.camel@blue>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:10:53PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 11:56, Christopher Fowler wrote:
>
> > The path is not needed since the original email had a cd into /etc/init.d
>
> Yeah, but does "at" inherit the current environment when something is
> scheduled? Even if it did, your original example left out the leading
> ./ on the "sshd start" statement.
It does inherit the environment. The seconds sshd needs './'
>
> Chris, again, I know your intentions were good so I hope that you don't
> think of this as condescending. You've always been a big help. My
> "issue" lies with the guy/gal at openssh who changed the startup script.
> ;)
If the system is valuable then you should have access other than inband.
I've had a few occasions where problems have come up that would have
kept my boxen down until I could have driven to them.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Jim P.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale