[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] SSH Patch

Subject: [ale] SSH Patch
From: jonathan at xcorps.net (Jonathan Rickman)
Date: Tue Sep 16 20:58:13 2003
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tuesday 16 September 2003 19:26, Transam wrote:

> I am on record as saying that the ssh.com has a better security history
> than OpenSSH and I use the ssh.com version exclusively on my systems
> and my clients's systems (where allowed).

Bob!!! The dream team can't possibly be wrong!!! They haven't had a remote 
hole in the default install in 100 years!!!
</dripping sarcasm>

Honestly, the work that the OpenBSD/OpenSSH team has done is commendable. 
But the events of the last 24 hours have shown once again that even they 
are not invincible, much to their chagrin. It would be nice if they, and 
all the rabid OpenBSD zealots out there would come to grips with that 
fact. 

-- 
Jonathan Rickman
Key ID: 0DF501FF

References:
- [ale] SSH Patch
  - From: jonathan at xcorps.net (Jonathan Rickman)
- [ale] SSH Patch
  - From: bob at verysecurelinux.com (Transam)

Prev by Date: [ale] SSH Patch
Next by Date: [ale] ip_tables error message
Previous by thread: [ale] SSH Patch
Next by thread: [ale] FW: [PenguinFest] MEETING!!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread